I’m reading the Book Sex and the Supremacy of Christ Edited by John Piper and Justin Taylor. In the opening of the book, John Piper lays 2 foundational points on which the rest of the book’s multi-authored essays are to expound upon. First, he states the claim that sexuality is designed by God as a way to know God more fully. The second is that knowing God is designed by God as a way of guarding and guiding our sexuality. On the surface, both ideas are ones I find agreeable and are ones that have been preached upon in various ways by several authors and speakers. As I continued reading Piper’s opening essay, however, I found myself very uncomfortable with how he explained the first idea.
The first idea presented by Piper is that God designed sexuality as a way to know him more fully. His usage of “know” is very similar to how Adam knew Eve (Gen. 4:1) and how Joseph did not “know” Mary, though she was found with child (Matthew 1:24-25). I guess my hang up is the adjoining of “knowing” (i.e. the intimacy that can be shared as two people engage with one another sexually) and God.
Piper discusses the imagery of sinful Israel as compared to a whore and his unrelenting mercy toward her. He wraps up the introduction of this point with this statement:
“God made us powerfully sexual so that he would be more deeply knowable. We were given the power to know each other sexually so that we might have some hint of what it will be like to know Christ supremely…God means for human sexual life to be a pointer and foretaste of our relationship with him.” (p.30)
I have to be honest here. As I read the first few pages of the first chapter where Piper presented his first point, I became very uncomfortable. I’m not sure why, but the mere idea of our sexuality, our shared intimacy, the peaks of ecstasy that one reaches during sexual relations with another, as being a “foretaste of our relationship with Him” creeps me out a little. I was uncomfortable enough to where I didn’t know whether Piper was right or wrong. I agreed with scripture, but something didn’t sit right…
To me, Piper’s first idea sounded a little too much like the ideas held by some pagans and cult groups – the ones that use and manipulate sex that promise the climax you attain is how you know God fully or is some form of spiritual awakening.
My mind also wandered to the Unification church and the abuse of sexual rites by its founder Reverend Moon. In their “holy text” The Divine Principle, it presents the idea that the original sin was Eve getting caught having sex with Satan. As a result, Moon presented the idea (early in his cult’s history) that because of this act between Eve and Satan, every woman was born naturally dirty and had to be cleansed by him before she could consummate a marriage with her soon-to-be husband. What this means is that Moon told women that in order for them to be cleansed of Eve’s original sin, they had to sleep with him – it was only after sleeping with him would they be able to present themselves as “pure and whole” on their wedding night.
Lastly, and perhaps the strongest source of discomfort as I read through Piper’s opening remarks stemmed from my own past experiences and beliefs of sexuality. Even in my life, as a result of both choice and force, the reality of sex and sexuality became nothing more than another physical interaction between two people. No intimacy…no love…and surely nothing I would want to think of as a glimpse of the fullness of my relationship with Christ.
The funny thing is that really, I am in full agreement with all that Piper presents in this first chapter, including his usage of scripture and its application to the ideas surrounding sex and sexuality. Perhaps then, my discomfort is less an indicator of any fault or falsehood in his first point…and more of an indicator of just how distorted sex, sexuality and intimacy has become in today’s society.
I have only read through the first chapter, but already I’m very uncomfortable and deeply saddened. IF the points presented by Piper are in fact correct it means that we (our culture/society as a whole) have completely missed the mark with regards to sex and sexuality. Not only have we missed the mark in understanding its purpose, but we have taken something that was intended to be holy and beautiful and have deduced it to little more than a pastime or vehicle by which we attempt to serve only ourselves with good feelings, validation, and power. We have made that which God intended to point directly to our shared intimacy with Him, into something that exists and is used primarily for the purpose of ourselves.